<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="0.92"><channel>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<title>DABCC RSS | Virtualization Analysis</title>
<link>http://www.dabcc.com/section.aspx?sectionid=11</link>
<description>This RSS Feed displays the latest Articles on 'Virtualization Analysis'</description>
<copyright>(c) 1999-2007 DABCC Inc.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:23:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-US</language>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.dabcc.com/Virtualization-Analysis" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Automating the Disaster Recovery Process through Virtualization</title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/356881440/article.aspx</link>
<description>While virtualization simplifies and lowers the cost of disaster recovery, it leaves the challenges of automating the recovery of virtual machines.  VMware?s new Site Recovery Manager application is similar to an ERP application in the way it defines business processes and forces organizations to adopt a dynamic but process-driven recovery framework.  ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/356881440" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:23:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8312</feedburner:origLink></item><item>
<title>There Are No Free Hypervisors ? Citrix Xen, Microsoft Hyper-V, and VMware ESXi will all Cost you in the End</title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/351782932/article.aspx</link>
<description>VMware has just made VMware ESXi ?free?. Citrix makes a big deal out of the fact that its Xen hypervisor is ?free?. Microsoft?s Hyper-V is included in Windows Server 2008, so it is ?free?. However, none of these products is really free; you will pay for all of them in various ways....&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/351782932" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:35:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8266</feedburner:origLink></item><item>
<title>Virtualization Management: vmSight Detailed Product Review</title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/339266912/article.aspx</link>
<description>Detailed product review of vmSight, a performance and access management solution for virtualized desktops on the VMware, Citrix Xen and soon Microsoft Hyper-V platforms.
...&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/339266912" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:20:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8201</feedburner:origLink></item><item>
<title>How VMware Can Stop the Microsoft and Citrix Push for Virtualization Dominance </title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/335305538/article.aspx</link>
<description>My last week?s article detailed why I feel VMware is falling prey to Microsoft's age-old way to market dominance so this week I took the opposite approach and have tried to explain the four key areas VMware must address in order to win the war and/or at least not become the next Netscape / Novell....&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/335305538" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8155</feedburner:origLink></item><item>
<title>VMware?s Woes - Is Microsoft Virtualization to Blame?</title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/330737693/article.aspx</link>
<description>Today, VMware announced it has fired (my words, not theirs) one of their founders and the current CEO, Diane Greene.  This came as a huge shock to me and most of us in the virtualization industry.   In the following article I will explain why I think VMware?s Board let Diane go an why VMware's stock falling like a MythBusters project to determine the terminal velocity of a 21 billion dollar rock falling from the top of the Empire State Building, and why do I think this is mostly caused by Micro...&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/330737693" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:59:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8115</feedburner:origLink></item><item>
<title>Thoughts on VMware's New CEO - Paul Maritz</title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/330059478/article.aspx</link>
<description>VMware faces enormous challenges and enormous opportunities. Paul Maritz might be just the right person to take the company to the next level and to really give Microsoft a run for its money....&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/330059478" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:16:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8112</feedburner:origLink></item><item>
<title>Five Reasons Why VMware Virtualization is Better than Microsoft Hyper-V</title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/328711646/article.aspx</link>
<description>In Bernd Harzog's recent article, Microsoft Hyper-V Virtualization: Resistance is Futile (Almost), an anonymous user posted a very interesting comment detailing five reasons why Microsoft Hyper-V might not be so hard to resist compared to VMware's true enterprise virtualization solution.    I liked the comment so much I figured I would share it with all.  ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/328711646" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8105</feedburner:origLink></item><item>
<title>Microsoft Hyper-V Virtualization: Resistance is Futile (Almost)</title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/321548784/article.aspx</link>
<description>Hyper-V does not mean the end of VMware. On the contrary, it means a dramatic growth in the entire virtualization market ? enough growth so that Microsoft, VMware, and Citrix will all prosper in their own ways....&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/321548784" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8029</feedburner:origLink></item><item>
<title>Virtualization Management:  VMware B-hive Detailed Product Review</title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/314839759/article.aspx</link>
<description>VMware did not just buy any one of several interesting Applications Performance Management vendors. B-hive is unique in several important respects, which will serve to both change the market for virtualization platforms and for APM vendors in the virtualization market. Given this, I thought that a detailed review of the B-hive product was in order....&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/314839759" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:51:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=7988</feedburner:origLink></item><item>
<title>Citrix XenApp is Delayed, Stop Your Complaining Already</title>
<link>http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~3/310728546/article.aspx</link>
<description>I hear a lot of engineers complaining about how long it takes Citrix to bring out another version of XenApp.  There is a slew of negative news on how it took Microsoft more than five years to release Vista and now it looks like we won?t see Windows 7 until the end of 2010.  Not to mention, you know it will ship with a lot less features than Microsoft shows off to all of us right now.  It really boils my blood when I hear people say that Apple is just so quick to market with new revisions of OS ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.dabcc.com/~r/Virtualization-Analysis/~4/310728546" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:54:00 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=7946</feedburner:origLink></item></channel>
</rss>
